Investment Objective: VanEck Vietnam ETF is an investment vehicle . It is currently trading at 17.11 USD.
Portfolio Composition:
The fund is heavily weighted towards
the Financial Services sector (32%),
the Real Estate sector (22%),
the Consumer Defensive sector (16%)
and markets in
Viet Nam (100%),
United States (0%),
Other (0%)
.
For a full breakdown of all holdings, see the "Weights" card above.
Income: This is a distributing fund with a current yield of 0.20%.
Yes, it pays an annual dividend of 0.04 USD (0.20% yield).
VanEck Vietnam ETF is classified as a ETF. You can compare it against its peer in the "Related Symbols" list.
The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities that comprise the fund's benchmark index. The index includes securities of Vietnamese companies. A company is generally considered to be a Vietnamese company if it is incorporated in Vietnam. It is non-diversified.
| Year | Total Dividends |
|---|---|
| ▸2026 |
0.04 USD
|
| Dec. 30, 2026 (estimated) | 0.0385 |
| ▸2025 |
0.04 USD
|
| Dec. 26, 2025 | 0.0380 |
| ▸2023 |
0.67 USD
|
| Dec. 29, 2023 | 0.0185 |
| Dec. 22, 2023 | 0.6550 |
| ▸2022 |
0.11 USD
|
| Dec. 30, 2022 | 0.0034 |
| Dec. 23, 2022 | 0.1110 |
| ▸2021 |
0.10 USD
|
| Dec. 27, 2021 | 0.1030 |
| ▸2020 |
0.09 USD
|
| Dec. 28, 2020 | 0.0700 |
| Jan. 6, 2020 | 0.0160 |
| ▸2019 |
0.11 USD
|
| Dec. 30, 2019 | 0.1050 |
| ▸2018 |
0.15 USD
|
| Dec. 27, 2018 | 0.1220 |
| Jan. 3, 2018 | 0.0250 |
| ▸2017 |
0.15 USD
|
| Dec. 22, 2017 | 0.1520 |
| ▸2016 |
0.37 USD
|
| Dec. 23, 2016 | 0.3180 |
| Jan. 5, 2016 | 0.0470 |
| ▸2015 |
0.50 USD
|
| Dec. 28, 2015 | 0.4990 |
| ▸2014 |
0.51 USD
|
| Dec. 29, 2014 | 0.5100 |
| ▸2013 |
0.60 USD
|
| Dec. 30, 2013 | 0.5990 |
| ▸2012 |
0.37 USD
|
| Dec. 31, 2012 | 0.3670 |
| ▸2011 |
0.16 USD
|
| Dec. 30, 2011 | 0.1630 |
| ▸2010 |
0.34 USD
|
| Dec. 30, 2010 | 0.3420 |
| ▸2009 |
0.04 USD
|
| Dec. 30, 2009 | 0.0360 |
| Name | Payment Date | Status | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| VanEck Vietnam ETF | Dec 26, 2025 | Paid | 0.038 USD |
Community Discussion